/dis/ - Discussion

I think the line between them is blurry. The Disney movie makes any research on the idea impossible.
I think a dissection is more about exposing the internal organs, where being turned inside out includes the bones and veins in your limbs

>>19054
by being turned inside out I imagine something like Jolyne Kujo in her fight with C-Moon from JoJo

From the perspective of topology, getting turned inside out has no cutting or non-continuos transformations where a vivisection would require cutting or other non-continuous operations. What it would look like would depend on what you consider the "inside" of a person.

funny to see this ancient thread get bumped. anyway. if necrophilia is your only goal, then you don’t need to look further than the americas. a small-town funeral director position is where it’s at, and i speak (loosely) from experience. i grew up in a tiny town with a family-run funeral home, and the owner was both the county coroner and the one who handled all the embalming. so, in cases of ordinary, inconspicuous death, they’d be there from the time that person was pronounced dead to the time that that person went in the ground (or a casket, at least). you could do anything in that time, as long as the embalming still got properly done.

i seriously contemplated going into mortuary work for a time and was even on fairly close terms with the director (although, i didn’t think they were a necrophiliac). things didn’t work out however. but, maybe this idea could prove useful to someone else.

I've never studied the individual moral guidelines of African communities, but I'm pretty sure on average, they respect the dead. Everyone knows each other, because they all live next to each other in their own little tight nit villages and whatnot.
As far as punishment for sex stuff goes, they'll castrate an unmarried couple for fornicating; what makes you think they won't lop your balls off for fucking a corpse?

>>18918
I would think even rural small town funeral homes/mortuaries these days have CCTV so getting handsy with a cute dead body would still net some risk. Not that I'm an expert on the regulations and legal requirements.

>>18959
ymmv. this was circa the mid-90s and i know for a fact that they didn’t even have a cooler to keep the bodies in (again, tiny town, not a lot of deaths, they’d get embalmed nearly as soon as they died unless there was a religious exemption). so i highly doubt that they had cctv back then either.

>>18959
There's a difference between being recorded and being caught on camera. Most security cams aren't even CHECKED unless a crime has already been reported, to say nothing of how few are actively watched. Cameras tend to go either to a security office and/or to an off-site server farm. In the latter case, there's going to be like four people in charge of 50,000 live feeds, and their job isn't paying attention, it's making sure the video is going into the hard drives in case it's needed later. In the former, in a one-man operation, the "security office" is most likely the mortician's work PC.
All you have to do is not give anyone involved a reason to check the security cameras. Hell, the camera layout might not even be good, then you can have your fun in a blind spot for extra security.

As for the original question, just because a society doesn't have CCTV's and well-equipped police doesn't mean you can get away with anything. If there's a lot of dead bodies around, it's either a warzone or a plague zone and you don't want to stick your dick in someone who just died of Ebolaids. As for making your own, most bush communities are low-trust as fuck, ESPECIALLY around foreigners. You go to one of those tribes and there will be someone around to keep an eye on you 24/7. And as mentioned, village girls tend to travel in packs to ward off rapists and cranky hippotami. Also, getting caught (or even suspected) might result in you getting burnt alive, because mob justice makes the American prison system look like a resort chain. People who do that are usually full-on gangs who go to other tribes to grab multiple girls at a time.
The pros go to Central America. Yeah, you might get kidnapped and have and ear cut off by a dude who looks like his dad was an industrial paint mixing machine, but there's an endless stream of migrants with zero documentation. The Guatemalan authorities don't give a fuck about the Venezuelan transient's camp with 5,000 people in it because none of those pendejos pay taxes, every third male is a gang member, and the girls are ruining the local prostitution economy. Get to know the area well enough and take a few risks and you can probably experience the aftermath of some chick misusing heroin, or create one.

>>18107
>>18368
as a maso. guy, for some reason if I had-to-had some slice sliced off me and eaten by a woman, Id rather it be a milf. or even a bit older+milf than a young woman, even tho I generally don't crave mature women much.
Dunno why, Im sure any psychologist would have a field day, or week , with me if I tried to explain this.

>>18459
>as a maso. guy, for some reason if I had-to-had some slice sliced off me and eaten by a woman, Id rather it be a milf. or even a bit older+milf than a young woman, even tho I generally don't crave mature women much.
I kinda get that, I'm not into cannibalism, but if it had to happen, I want it to be horny MILF's. Preferably asian.

>Im sure any psychologist would have a field day, or week , with me if I tried to explain this.
This enire site is an untapped mine of psychological oddities and unexplored abnormalities. I'm sure studying us is some PHD's wet dream.

I recently found out the girl I'm dating is a freak and a masochist herself. I'm going to see if I can convince her to bite or cut me. If not, I'll just see if she'll let me punch her.

I have defined\classified some of my "fantasy play fields" as a male masochist. This is fantasy as it's either illegal or lethal (or merely cost so much I'd need to be an oil company CEO) to do IRL.
>Medical Masochism: a doctor or surgeon girl puncturing me, giving me shocks, binding with strong threads the limbs, blood-letting, asphyxiation, etc
>Police masochism: maze ,or just pepper spray, being hit with baton and tonfa, forced to lick tactical boots, tasered, handcuffed and waterboarded, 4-point restraint + the previous ones
>Pro-wrestling death match: tied with barbed wire, thrown against cinder blocks, (non mercury) lighting bulb rods, flaming chairs from high up. Kicked ,punched, thrown and knee capped by a girl who actually knows how to fight
>"industrial femdom". A set row of girls in a sort of line, each pays a fee and whips me for 100, 200 times or whatever while im suspended by hooks. so on, they do various sadisms after paying some coins in a box. drip burning wax (500mm, etc), kick me 50 times ,so on. in an orderly, bureaucratic, monetized factory-masochist male type
Sorry if I make a horrible laundry lists of fetishes..each one is supposed to be a cohesive unit, not a mere stupid list. As I said in other post I hate bdsm as a cultural thing and the role of "dominatrix" is just insecure and ,honestly, not THAT GOOD a fantasy for the man to have.

>>18070
if a girl can outsmart me and outdominate me i'll take it and ask for more

if not i'll make her pay until one of us kills the other

I believe there are many masochistic submissive guys here. I am one of them. I watch all the pictures and dream of being one of the victims. And most of all i love hanging, slaughtering like an animal and beheading. One day i wish to die in one of these ways. Like a willing volunteer.

Personally I'm not into real Gore animated drawn and stuff like that is more my taste I can't do real stuff it turns me off and I wouldn't call myself the most empathetic or nonsidistic person

>>18838
I have been exposed to dead animals and seen them die in front of me a couple times. While it's true that the rolling eyes did really make me think on how it would be in fiction, the reality is that in the heat of the moment I was both disgusted and sad. So much that I couldn't even get close to the carcass. We are talking about animals here, if it was an human I would be even more disgusted because I would think it's just disrespectful. Now if it was a doll or something I would never sympathize with, then I would probably phantasize about it. But that's all, fantasy, I would feel remorseful it was a real corpse because I would think it had a family and so.

>>19069
> No, this is how all fiction works and this is fundamental issue with all fiction. which has no fix.
Then stop trying to fix it.

> you who is allergic to any negative emotion no matter how weak it is that's great but I rather prefer wider range of emotions than being stuck in never ever ending euphoria.
I'm not "allergic to any negative emotion", I look for comedy when I want to laugh and look for tragedy when I want to cry. You instead look at my comedy, find no crying and complain.

> it will be same for you as if now somebody wrote tragic story about those twins,(like how they suddenly die during a trip) that you not make you feel sad at all you would juts read it and possibly even jerk off on the tragedy and move to another.
Of course it can make me sad, because I can not only separate fiction from reality, but also one piece of fiction from another, an ability which you not only lack, but it seems you can't even imagine other people having it.

> If on the other hand you use original character then as author you sort of have power to kill them for real
No, you've just established before that all fiction is the same in this regard and it has no fix. Now you're contradicting yourself once again.

> However If that author decided to write any other tragic story with the same characters it would no longer be sad because now they are officially immortal in that story universe.
That is absolutely NOT how a story's universe works. Your understanding of fiction is preposterous.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>19133

>I suggest that, no matter what Onix says next, you ignore it. You're in the right but this exchange is starting to derail an interesting thread.

Yeah at this point I'm seriously considering deleting all the off topic spam.

>>19119
Are you a masochist? I can't even begin to want to try to explain why not all fictional stories are linked to someone who clearly demonstrates a lack of mental capacity to understand basic abstract concepts.

Either he's trolling you, or fundamentally incapable of understanding what "fiction" is as a concept, and that's not something you're going to fix. Stop torturing yourself, unless the wounds you enjoy are self inflicted mental ones.

>>18838
I mostly numb myself. So if the criteria for getting me hard is met (attractive subject and right situation) then it doesn't really matter to me if it's real, I just push the "guilty feelings" into a box. Sometimes I feel bad after, but they're long dead, zero interest in doing anything to a real person or corpse, so guilt is minimal. Essentially I selectively dehumanize images under a very select set of feelings and conditions.

Like someone else said, most real stuff lacks quality, or doesn't meet my criteria. There isn't much to look at, the internet has been pretty sanitized of necrophilia content.

>>18808
i’d rather not. plenty of people are into illustrated guro exclusively and would be turned off by proximity to “the real thing.” and it’d suck for gurochan (which has stayed up fairly consistently for the past year, iirc) to get pulled down by a hosting and/or legal kerfuffle. this is coming from someone who likes real gore, btw, so i have no vendetta or anything.

it's not a matter of users getting turned off, but real thing simply being harder to host.

>>18793
Gorechan had child gore with barely mosaic-ed genitalia. That's probably a little illegal, but I dunno legals
It could be banned, but then the question of where to draw the line would rise

>>18818
Why not make a seperate board? 4chan has /gif/ for the real thing and everywhere else for drawn or generated.
>>18821
Draw the line at Japan's AoC.

>>18793
By all means, please do! There needs to be gore board again that's actually good.

>>19046
*a gore board, my bad

I think in theory /ai/ could host both gore and scat lora discussions, but the interest for gore is much higher, meaning scat threads there would fall off page 1 too quickly. If it gets like 1 post a week, it may as well be a general thread on /s/.
>>18952
It was originally created on /ai/, if we go with general thread it would need to be remade with a fitting OP for it. Then that Futaba lora can really just be posted in the general thread in one post.

>>18951
"In the interest of compromise"

AI stuff being allowed to exist in its own segregated board is already the compromise.

>>18972
The mod said that AI was allowed in the regular threads in /s/, something I imagine not everyone is happy about. Plus, as the person above said, having a general scat AI thread in /ai/ would be impractical given its lack of activity. It might be better to just have a general thread on /s/, with all AI posting being directed there so that it doesn't mix with the other threads.

I think Ai is generally fine in moderation but it can turn into spam easily because of very easy production.

so probably it should be ok to post some AI images anywhere but when it becomes overwhelming it has to go to another place because otherwise it will drown non AI content

>>18972
More boards is a bad idea if we want to make the job easier.

>>18888
>We're all just flesh, what gives one the right to do harm to another for personal pleasure?

Apparently >>18891 does.

>>17268
I would join and how have you been here since you were a kid. I found out about this site last year, it's so niche.

Nope. This is just fantasy to me. I couldn't live with myself if I harmed someone innocent.

>>18891
What about the anon who asks for loli to get its own board?

>>18985
yea i exagerated, I just see aoi specifically lecturing a lot of people here and I kinda like it. Thank you guys for fighting for our collective karma, love you

>>17076
>>17264
don't listen to them. This site wouldn't be the same without your schizo ramblings

Long story short, every site everywhere gets spambots but gurochan combines both an interest in materials that are already in a legal grey area or flat-out illegal in a lot of places and a lack of resources for proper defence against such infiltration (really you'd need a 24/7 professional mod team, and there's no way that can be done with what the gc staff have available) which makes the place attractive to people trying to sell illegal material.

On top of that there's a secondary problem specific to gurochan which is that one particular disgruntled ex-poster apparently goes on occasional cp-spamming sprees. Banning is useless on an anonymous image board so all the mods can do is remove the stuff when they see it, which can take several hours because again there's not enough of them to maintain a 24/7 watch and they all have other shit to do (afaik nobody here does this as their day job).

>>18899
What do you think about making their job easier?

any portrait of saint sebastian would look very nice, especially if you have other works of religious iconography in your home (although, i’m biased because i am into twinks). and if you don’t mind dominant women in your guro art, a print of caravaggio’s judith beheading holofernes might be up your alley. i’d also recommend looking around for classically-styled japanese eroguro prints. not too many artists specifically come to mind (since most of the ones i know of either primarily depict men, are very sexual, or both), but there’s definitely nicer stuff in that style too.

while not as “classy,” posters for old horror and/or exploitation films might also capture that same vibe. you can genuinely buy compilation books of those sorts of posters on amazon, kek.

you could always commission an artist you like/who does traditional oil painting. even a digital artist, i bet you could have it printed on poster paper at, like staples

This too obvious for you?

Get a print of The Execution of Lady Jane Grey. You have the plausible deniability of it being "high art" while also being one of the most erotic paintings ever put to canvas, for us at least.

>>17195
>while not as “classy,” posters for old horror and/or exploitation films might also capture that same vibe. you can genuinely buy compilation books of those sorts of posters on amazon, kek.
https://www.terribleposters.com/
This site I stubled across has some posters like that.

If you still want deniability but can't find anything classy you want, a lot of more niche metal outfits have guro posters, mainly grindcore type stuff. So you won't be able to pass it of as high art, but you might be able to have some excuse if you like metal or can at least fake it enough.

>Would you kill someone for that fantasy?
If I could get away with it.

>Or would you fuck a real dead body?
If the body is very fresh, although I might make an exception if it's a little kid.

>>18784
exactly

Devil's Advocate on Moral Utilitarianism: Killing a mite produces pain and disables a Qualia\ kills a sentient being. fucking a corpse is ethically use of an object -notwithstanding "property rights" ,ie; relative's feelings. but that's accessory and not intrinsic to the fact (For example having a T-shirt of a panda isn't immoral but if you wear it to a PTSD therapy group of panda survivors, it can be considered an Accessory Argument for immortality of that same action) .
So, ethically speaking fucking corpse is ,in itself, merely an erogenous use of an inert item, however killing a mite is actively using violence and pain-inducing measures to kill a sentient being with no value produced, not even hedonic value (which can presumably be obtained through erogenous stimulation)

I look at images of cannibalism but in real life I'm a vegetarian. I'm a generally peaceful person and hurting people is the last thing I would want to do. I'm squeamish about real life injuries and death.

>>4921
In a lawful society where I am expected to act a certain way, no.

In a lawless post apocalypse sort of setting? Yeah